Every part of you is welcome.
Even the ones you don’t like.

What is parts work therapy?

Parts work begins by refusing a very old assumption: that a healthy person is a single, unified self, and that our inner voices which don't match that ideal are flaws to be corrected. We're more like a collection of parts, some of whom disagree with each other, but all of whom ultimately want something good for us, even if we dislike their methods. The part of you that you like least—the inner critic, the procrastinator, the one that dissociates out or lashes out—is almost always trying to protect you, doing a job it took on a long time ago. When you understand what it's protecting and why, it doesn't have to run the show anymore.

I practice parts work online, across Washington state, often woven together with EMDR for processing trauma. If you want the short version, that's it: we get to know the parts of you that have been working overtime, we find out what they've been guarding, and we use EMDR to process the traumatic events we might unearth so that they don’t have to work so hard anymore.

In this type of therapy (and hopefully in our daily lives), we try to honor the diversity of inner experience, and recognize that all of the voices are parts of us, many carrying their own history, their own logic, and their own reasons for existing.

The idea that the psyche is fundamentally plural runs through a century of depth psychology. Jung described the mind as full of complexes, or “splinter psyches,” in his more evocative phrasing. These are fragments that split off under strain and behave like independent beings, capable of overriding the conscious will. The ego-state therapists later formalized this clinically. Internal Family Systems (IFS) gave it the structure and vocabulary that a lot of people now recognize.

What they all share is a reframe that changes everything: you are not your symptoms, and you are not your worst part. You are both the collection of them all, and the core Self who can turn toward those parts.

The cast: protectors, exiles, and the logic underneath

If you've read about parts work, you may already know some of the basic vocabulary used in IFS.

Exiles are the parts that carry pain. Not "bad memories," exactly. What they carry is closer to a burden: an extreme belief or feeling absorbed at the moment something hurt. I'm too much. I'm not safe. I have to earn my place. The memory is the container; the burden is the cargo. The goal isn't simply to remember what happened; it's to help the part release what it's been carrying ever since.

Protectors are the parts that keep the exiles out of reach, and they come in two functional kinds:

Some protectors, which IFS calls “managers,” work ahead of the pain: the planner, the perfectionist, the inner critic, the caretaker, the part that intellectualizes everything, the one that scans the room before you enter it. They keep the whole system so well-managed that the exile’s old wound rarely gets near the surface.

Others work after the exile’s pain has surfaced. IFS calls these “firefighters.” Their goal is to get the flood of overwhelming emotion from the exile under control. These parts may dissociate, self-harm, use substances, or do other things that the managers disapprove of. Managers are often the parts who drive us to seek therapy, and so many people walk in already at war with the firefighters parts, convinced they're the problem.

But a protector that looks destructive is almost always doing a job it took on when no better option existed. It has a positive intention even when its impact is wrecking things. The two kinds of protector are often in conflict with each other. The part that enforces restraint all week and the part that blows it out on Friday are not enemies of yours, they're enemies of each other, and you're the one living inside the crossfire. So the work is never to override a protector or argue it down. It's to find out what it's afraid would happen if it stopped, and to address that, the thing underneath, rather than fighting the guard at the door.

Internal Family Systems (IFS) and the wider tradition

Internal Family Systems, developed by Richard Schwartz, is the framework most people have encountered: through No Bad Parts, through a therapist, or through the general cultural rise of "parts" language over the last decade. It's a good map, and it informs how I listen and what I pay attention to in session, but it isn't a technique I apply by the manual, and I'm not a member of their directory. What I bring is parts work drawn from a wider tradition than any single brand: Jung's complexes, the ego-state therapy of John and Helen Watkins, the structural dissociation model used in complex trauma treatment, and IFS.

What actually happens in session

There's no fixed script, but there is a consistent move at the center of it, called unblending.

When a part takes over completely, you don't experience it as a part. You experience it as you. "I am anxious." "I am worthless." "I am furious." That total fusion is called being blended. Much of the actual skill of parts work is creating just enough separation that you can be with the part instead of being it. We’re moving toward a shift from "I am anxious" to "a part of me feels anxious." That's the operational move that makes everything else possible, because it puts you back in the room with the part, rather than underneath it.

From that less-blended place, it becomes possible to access a kind of steady, unforced curiosity toward the part, without an agenda to fix it or be rid of it. In session, that quality is actually diagnostic. If someone says "I just want this part gone," that's usually not them speaking—that's another protector, one part trying to exile another. Real curiosity toward a part, with no agenda against it, is the thing we're working to find. When it's present, the part you've been fighting will often, finally, tell you what it's been carrying.

Where parts work meets EMDR

In a lot of approaches that use IFS for trauma, the destination is unburdening, which is a quiet internal process of releasing what an exiled part has carried. It's real, and it can be beautiful. But for many people, it can also feel vague, too difficult to approach, or hard to trust.

So once parts work has done its essential job (earning the protectors' permission, building enough internal safety that a wounded part can be approached at all) I often shift into EMDR to do the actual processing. EMDR is more structured. You hold the difficult material while engaging in brief sets of dual-attention stimulation—one foot in the old memory, one foot here in the present—which is exactly what keeps it from tipping into re-traumatization. We work in small doses and move deliberately between activation and settling: what Peter Levine named titration and pendulation. Hard things become possible to metabolize in pieces, instead of all at once.

Put simply, parts work is how we get to the door and earn the right to open it. EMDR is often how we move through what's behind it: gently, in increments, with no one getting overwhelmed.

Where parts work might show up in treatment

Parts may show up differently depending on what you're bringing in.

Shame around desire, kink, or non-monogamy. Parts work often means meeting the part that learned our desires were wrong, and building enough internal trust that it doesn't have to hide anymore.

Neurodivergent adults, especially those who've masked for a long time. We often have parts that performed a very emotionally taxing mask, and a self underneath that never really had room to exist.

Gender exploration and queerness. There are often parts holding a great deal at once. Relief, grief, hope, fear—sometimes in conflict. Parts work gives them all somewhere to be.

Trauma, especially complex or relational trauma. The parts that formed around those experiences can be the most important ones to finally sit with. Parts work and EMDR operate well together here.

Ready when you are.

Book your first session

Further reading

Some of my clients have already done their own reading, and many like to go to the source. If that's you, this is the lineage behind how I work, listed roughly from the accessible to the clinical.

  • Richard C. Schwartz, No Bad Parts: Healing Trauma and Restoring Wholeness with the Internal Family Systems Model (Sounds True, 2021). The most readable entry point to IFS and the "no bad parts" premise. Start here if you want one book.

  • Peter A. Levine, Waking the Tiger: Healing Trauma (North Atlantic Books, 1997). The origin of the titration and pendulation ideas that shape how I pace EMDR: trauma understood as survival energy the nervous system never got to complete.

  • C. G. Jung, "A Review of the Complex Theory," in The Collected Works of C. G. Jung, Vol. 8: The Structure and Dynamics of the Psyche (Princeton University Press; essay originally 1934). Elaboration on the "splinter psyches" idea. The psyche as plural, a century before it was fashionable. A dense but rewarding essay.

  • John G. Watkins & Helen H. Watkins, Ego States: Theory and Therapy (W. W. Norton, 1997). The clinical formalization of working with parts ("ego states"), from the originators of the approach. More technical.

  • Francine Shapiro, Eye Movement Desensitization and Reprocessing (EMDR): Basic Principles, Protocols, and Procedures (Guilford Press; foundational text, first published 1995). The primary source on EMDR, from its developer. Clinical, but definitive.

  • Onno van der Hart, Ellert R. S. Nijenhuis & Kathy Steele, The Haunted Self: Structural Dissociation and the Treatment of Chronic Traumatization (W. W. Norton, 2006). The complex-trauma anchor. A more neurobiologically grounded account of how trauma splits the self. The deep end; included for the genuinely curious.